STUART CAESAR : WARMONKEY

Monday, April 30, 2007

Wiping your ass on the flag.

Last week,a new disgrace was brought upon this nation,when the recently deceased Captain America,s costume was used as a prop in a drunken groping of a woman in a bar . Apparently, a group of doctors in Florida went on an after work bar crawl while dressed in costumes of different heroes , including the good Captain. Here,s some good advice, barfly, the next time you get the urge to embarrass yourself and your medical collegues in public by
getting hammered and groping an innocent girl, picking a fight with her boyfriend, forcing her to pick you out of a Captain America lineup!,and then attempting to flush a bag of marijuana down the toilet at the police station, at least have the decency to take off the costume of a hero who symbolizes the country you live in beforehand.
Next time, try a Bozo the Clown costume to perform your hijinks in,and let Cap rest in peace.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

3 In 1 Blitzkreig

A few comments on a few issues. First, the Virginia Tech massacre.This reprehensible psycho should not have been able to kill these kids with impunity, when one armed goodguy could have taken him out. All of these  school type killings  occur in gun free zones . The killers are aware they are gun free zones. They planned their cowardly murders based on this fact. Why are they not targeting gun shows or NRA conventions?Guess it takes away some of the fun when you shoot at someone who can shoot back,Huh?
 Don Imus. He was fired because he is a liberal who works for a liberal radio station and a
liberal news network.Liberals are like pirahna fish, they tend to eat their own.Stern, O,Reilly,
Limbaugh,and Hannity have said far more controversial things,yet they still have their jobs.I rest my case.
 
Alec Baldwin. I actually thought he was pretty funny in his Cat in the Hat movie. He plays a man who gets revenge on a woman who rejects him by threatening her children . The kids, however, have the last laugh by cleverly outwitting the enraged, but slow witted Baldwin.With
the help of the hatted one, of course.Sound familiar?I mean,except for the cat part , of course.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Virginia Tech

Could this tradgedy have been prevented? Probably not. When some nut decides to go on a shooting spree and then take himself out,he,s probably going to do it.
Does this mean that students and faculty alike should just line up like sacrificial sheep going to the slaughter? No! This campus was asleep at the switch in notifying students after the initial shooting,asleep in providing armed security to protect the grounds ,and criminally negligent in their public declaration that this campus was a gun free zone. Imagine advertising the fact that you are unable to protect the children that have been placed in your care , and in such an arrogantly , smug and politically correct manner! When is this anti gun
nonsense going to end?How many more of our children must die because of some misguided liberal agenda that promotes gun control for the good guys and in the process turns our school grounds into a shooting gallery for these scum who don,t have the guts to do the decent thing and just blow their own twisted brains out and leave our children alone.
Am I promoting arming our schools? You bet your sweet bippy Iam! The simple fact is that past on campus incidents like this one were prevented from escalating be cause of students and faculty that had guns and knew how to use them.This tragedy may not have been prevented but armed faculty and even students could have lessened the number of innocent lives lost.
Sound crazy and extremist?I really don,t care. I am right and you are wrong and my method lets more chidren live than your method.
One final thought. The previous worst mass murder on our soil was  in Texas a few years back, wnen a psycho crashed his car into a mall restaurant and began calmly shooting the customers, one by one. One of the diners was  a local Texas congresswoman
who was eating with her parents. She realized she could take him out , since she had her gun in her purse and the killer had his back to her.
Her heart sunk , when she realized that she had left her gun in her car, due to a new  local carry permit law that said guns must be left in your vehicle. That law cost her the life of both of her parents, who were shot to death right in front of her.So much for worrying about what the public thinks. I Want my child to live, even if it,s over the body of your mass murdering child, and you can bet thats one congresswoman that wont let public perception influence her personal safety decisions again.

Monday, April 9, 2007

Peter Pan; Unsutable for children?

With the release of the anniversary edition of Walt Disney,s Peter Pan comes the question;is this cartoon suitable for children? Well, lets examine the content and see.First, lets examine the author of the story himself,who had some legal controversy over his associatons with
children,sound familiar Michal Jackson? But that aside, lets look at the cartoon itself.I myself had not seen it since I was a kid ,so it kind of surprised me to see it through the cynicism of an adult perspective. To begin with ,Peter Pan is seen in menacing sillouette on the rooftop of the children,s home,waiting , believe it or not, for the parents to leave the house so he can break in the home through the children,s bedroom window! Then, he begins a thorough ransacking of the kids room, looking for his shadow supposedly! Yeah , that,ll hold up in court Pete! Next, he kidnaps them, and takes them to his hidden island filled with other children that he has abducted .
It gets even better. Captain Hook at one point shoots and kills one of his pirate crew for singing too loud,and I don,t mean the way Bugs and Daffy shot each other during rabbit and duck season, where they simply have blackened faces and burnt feathers, no I mean he shot him dead in the context of the cartoon.
The scene involving the Indian tribe is interesting too. The braves are colored the brighest red this side of an apple, and offer a peace pipe to children who are clearly too young to smoke!
And The kids,led by bad influence Pan, smoke it too!
My personal favorite, is the scene involving no less than Tinkerbelle in a blatant act of terrorism! It seems that when Miss Belle grows jealous of Pete,s attentions to the underage Wendy,she first attempts to make her crash while  flying, and later even goes as far as to betray her to Captain Hook, resulting in a bomb planted in a clock designed to blow Wendy and everyone else to kingdom come! Watch  the DVD, I,m not making this up!
Now of course I,m not really outraged by this, and other examples in the film ,but simply demonstrating how easy it is to fake outrage over complete non issues. The Bugs Bunny,Bullwinkle, Speed Racer , Jonny Quest and many other great cartoons that I remember as a kid were violent and written on an adult level; but are still far better than the mindless,drivel being made for kids now that are nothing more than an insult to childrens intellegence.Its not the violence but the intent behind the violence. Does good triumph over evil?Is the violence humerous? The three Stooges were. And still are to new generations of viewers. In summation for all of it,s politically incorrect flaws, the moral and heart of the cartoon Peter Pan is good and fine for kids then, and now.No matter what politically correct liberal phonies say.When popular Xbox games glamorize crazy postal workers and murderous drug gang goons you need not breathe very deep to smell the hypocracy.

Monday, April 2, 2007

Evidence not Theory

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. This is the credo that scientists and researchers live by , and the most appallingly obvious one that conspiracy theorists stubbornly ignore. Whether you,re talking about bigfoot, aliens, Kennedy assasination,or
global warming, you have to cut through the theoretical crap and look at the cold hard
evidence that backs up your premise.Unless you are willing to do this, you have left science
behind and have crossed over into the boundaries of fanaticism.
Wanting something to be true is not the same thing as proving something to be true, right
evolution theorists?
I believe in the possibility of an unknown species of hominid walking the forests of North America,in fact unknown species are uncovered all the time,but to have the balls to start a
website with members who pay dues to the homage of  a still unproven creature is foolish
and also has the stench of cheap fairground tricksterism.
This also applies to Al Gore and his global warming theory.Back in the seventies, it was the
global ice age theory,which was great for scaring gullible people, but also had no hard scientific evidence to back up the hyperbole.
This is what I,ll be raving about in this and in future entries,plus any political theories thatI feel need to be addressed, such as the cold hard fact that war is the only true proven way to assure peace. History proves me correct on this, so don,t dispute me, crack a book once in a while, and you,ll get a dose of truth, not theory.
One final thought regarding global warming and the flooding of the earth it will cause. Take a
glass , fill it halfway with water and add ice until the ice extends over the top of the glass. Now, if Mr. Gore,s theory is correct , as the ice melts, it should flow over the glass, spilling
on the table it sits on. But proven science, not hysterical theory,has proven that the ice can
only occupy the same amount of space as a liquid that it occupied as a solid, therefore creating no spill.But I guess Mr. Gore  would,nt know this, since since ice is banned in his house. You see, it wastes energy for his fridge to make it .