Am I My Brothers Keeper?

When Caine slew his brother Abel, God came upon him and asked,"Where is your brother?" Caine replied, "Am I my brothers keeper?" That eternal. question is still being asked today. Iran is about to execute a woman for the high crime of "adultery". Should we intervene? Is the Pope Catholic? Of course we should. If we call ourselves a nation founded on Judeo Christian principles , we have no choice. To ignore this situation is to make a mockery of the teachings of Jesus Christ; the teachings that our Constitution is founded on . Jesus stood alone against an angry mob bent on the destruction of a woman by stoning; a woman accused of the same crime as this Iranian woman. I don't have to point out the moral . We must face the grim reality that all Muslim nations are guilty of crimes of oppression against women. The reason?They all follow the teachings of the Prophet Muhammed, who committed these crimes , and instructs his followers to do so as well.  This is, of course, evil. We must stand against it and stop it ; by military force , if necessary. President Obama should stop using NASA for Muslim public relations , and take a stand against this atrocity that's about to occur. No amount of reaching out to Muslims , or making them "feel good" about their scientific contributions will ever erase the fact that they practice an evil religion that stomps on the freedom and liberty that was given to us by God, the real God, that believes in peace, love, and the brotherhood of man, and yes, that includes women as well. Am I my brothers keeper? God has given us the answer , and the answer is yes. And, what God has given, let no man put asunder; even a man called Muhammed.

The Doctrine of Destiny

Congratulations to General David Petraeus on his appointment as commander of our troops in Afghanistan. And, congratulations to President Obama, for finally admitting that he was wrong about the Iraq war, wrong about the surge, and wrong about his choice of liberal leaning , Fox News bashing General Stanly McChrystal to lead our forces against Al Queda and the Taliban. After all , appointing the man who was singularly responsible for our victory in Iraq seems to completely vindicate President Bush and validate his approach to the war on terror, known only as the"Bush Doctrine". Petraeus will no doubt continue this policy, and will reduce the nation building , diplomacy riddled approach that McChrystal used , much to our troops detriment. The Obama deadline for withdraw of troops by the end of July will also be re-thought, as it should be. The Afghans have a hard time trusting liberators that announce to the enemy the day and hour of their retreat, after all, how can you beat an enemy that already knows you have a deadline for victory? As we celebrate our Independence Day, we should remember one thing; that our freedom was obtained by a war that had one objective ; to kill our enemies , drive them from our shores, and force their surrender. And , I have no doubt that America would never have existed as we know it, had General Washington been using the "Obama Doctrine" , in his approach to fighting the Revolution.

The Moses Destiny

This Fourth of July, let us not forget to remember those that have given their lives for our freedom. And, also let us remember that the war we fight in Afghanistan is not a war of choice that can't be won, as RNC chairman Michael Steele has characterized it. They attacked us on 911. We are now taking the fight to the enemy, on their soil, so that we don't have to fight them on ours. In truth, we have no choice. We must wage this battle  and we must win it, or all our claims of Freedom , Liberty , and Justice are a lie,if we are unwilling to fight for it, against those that threaten it., not only on our shores , but everywhere on our planet. America is the caretaker of freedom. We will win because we must. It is our destiny , and duty to do so. As the Prophet Moses stood , overlooking the promised land , he said to the Israelites; "Go, proclaim liberty throughout the land, and to all the inhabitants thereof". The "land" that Moses spoke of is the earth itself, and we do indeed , have a responsibility to all the "inhabitants thereof", despite what Michael Steele, the hopefully "former" RNC chairman says.

Return of the Prodigal Son

Congratulations to General David Petraeus for being appointed commander of our forces in Afghanistan. And , congrats to President Bush, who has now been completely vindicated in his approach to the Iraq War, the Surge, and the Bush Doctrine in general. President Obama's appointment of General Petraeus , in the wake of General McChrystal's public meltdown via Rolling Stone magazine, proves that he knows that Bush was right.About everything that he opposed regarding the war, especially the surge of which there was no stronger opposition to than Senator Obama. This Fourth of July, let us remember the price of our freedom, victory in war by killing the enemy and forcing their surrender.  And now, with Petraeus in charge in Afghanistan, we now have a chance for complete victory. Hopefully, the General has another surge up his sleevYou see, Petraeus understands that when you go to war, your mission is to destroy the enemy and force their surrender.Nation building, political diplomacy, and restraint in combat , all part of the Obama McChrystal campaign,is a sure recipe for defeat, not victory. Unlike McChrystal, Petraeus will do what is necessary to win, and winning means eliminating Al-Queda and the Taliban from Afghanistan , completely and permanenly. This is the only method that works.It's the method that created our nation.  It's fortunate that the "Obama Doctrine" wasn't in effect during the Revolutionary War. America, as we know it, might never have existed at all.

The Second Coming

President Obama said he would get us out of Iraq; and yet we are still there. He said he would close Gitmo, and yet he hasn't. He said he would take the fight to Afghanistan, and capture Bin Laden, yet the mission there is unclear, and Bin Laden still at large. Why? To win a war, you must become war.You must fight to win, and that means destroying the enemy, scorched earth policy, forcing the surrender. General McChrystal understands this and also knows that the Commander in Chief was unwilling to give him the troops he needed , unwilling to take the fight to the enemy, unwilling to win. The result? The complete meltdown of General McChrystal ; a man who voted for Obama , banned Fox News from his barracks, and helped cover up the friendly fire death of Pat Tillman. This is a man who , in addition to being a military leader, is also a devout liberal, and a firm believer in the "Hope and Change" of Barack Obama. Faced with the disappointing reality of the Obama Presidency, he chose to snipe at the administration through Rolling Stone Magazine. Why? Why not confront  Obama directly, as other Generals have done with other Presidents.  The reason is misgfuided loyalty. McChrystal is loyal to President Obama. He should be loyal to the American people, since that's who he's fighting for.  Generals Patton and McArthur were also dismissed by the President for insubordination. , but both men confronted their Presidents directly with their disagreements, and forced the hand of their commander in chief. Both Patton and Mc Arthur understood what was best for the security of the American people, the ones they swore allegiance to. But McChrystal, having misplaced allegiance to a man, instead of a country, could only snipe indirectly , comitting a blatant breach of military protocol. Under General Patraeus , the architect of the surge in Iraq, this will not happen . He will do what is necessary to win and obey orders from the commander in chief. Until those orders begin to cost him victory and the lives of his soldiers , that is. Patraeus understands war, and understands the nature of his President . Obama also understands that he now has no choice . Failing at home in every domestic policy he has instituted, he now must place his legacy on the war front, if he is to be sucessful. He must give General Patraeus free reign to do his job.He must give Patraeus what he wants, and when he wants it, and then simply get out of his way . Because, one way of another, General Patraeus will have his way, and an assured victory to boot.

The Last Nero and the New Rome

To those that say President Obama has failed to take charge during the oil crises ; I say , nonsense! He's using the spill to push Cap and Trade again, as was always the plan, from"Day One" of the accident. He won't allow burning. He won't allow sand traps or leveys. He won't allow chemical cleanup. He won't allow foreign help. The reason is loyalty to the E.P.A. , and the unions who control Obama like a puppet on a string. The President will punish B.P. with fines and drilling restrictions , and will punish us with Cap and Trade, which in effect, is just another tax on private businesses and the working man. President Bush removed the Jones Act during Katrina to allow foreign aid. Obama will not do this because of his allegiance to the unions that bought and paid for his Presidency. Was Bush the better crises President? You Betcha! He was a leader who made decisions and took action. Obama is a wealth re-distributing community organizer whose main goal as President is to take money from those that earn it, and give it to those that don't. President Obama increasingly resembles Emperor Nero , watching Rome burn around him , without a care . Nero had his fiddle; Obama has his golf clubs, And like Nero, Obama will play on, as the economic security of our nation, burns around him.

The Wrath of the Great God Gaia

Since the dawn of time, humans have been hard wired to worship God , or gods. I can think of no better proof that there is a God. Even liberal atheists worship God, whether they want to admit it or not. Their god is Gaia, the earth god, mother earth , if you will . This is why we now have a Washington style , Spanish Inquisition of Tony Hayward and B.P.occuring at this moment. The liberal god has been offended . B.P. has comitted sacrilege against Gaia, and must now pay. And pay, and pay. The Liberal Dems seem to forget that it was President Obama ; their President, that gave the Deepwater Horizon rig safety awards , while President Bush cited them frequently for safety violations . If it is proven that B.,P, has been negligent and is at fault in the Hrizon Explosion that killed 11 employees, then they should face fines and prosecution and possibly even jail time . But, this is for the courts to decide , not the federal government. They have no business in a privately run companies affairs. More government regulation? No, the answer is always competition and choice in the free market. The more drilling we do, the more companies that are allowed to drill , the more competition there is in the oil business , the more they will be forced to regulate themselves better, if they want to stay in business, and avoid jail time and fines, that is. Blame B.P. if you will . But why demonize oil? Oil runs our lives . Our homes , cars , computers toys , ans even clothing and food products are made from oil. There is no other viable technology to replace it. How do I know? Money. If other options existed , we would be using them , guaranteed , cause there would be lots of monet to be made from it , for a lot of "greedy corporate types" , right liberals? I love oil. It runs my car , and heats my home, and does it quite effectively. And liberals should love oil too. Since they worship Gaia , they should look at oil as a gift to man from mother earth . A gift we should use , since we will never run out . How do I know? Because oil is created by internal pressure in the earth , not from dead dinosaur bones. The Deepwater Horizon well is still pumping away, over 50 days later, and showes no sign of slowing down, nor will it. Don't blame Obama for the spill? Nonsense. He is to blame. He gave safety awards to a shoddy run rig with obvious safety violations . He would not permit the burning off of the oil as it leaked , from,"day one" . This is a critical mistake. Burning off the oil is the standard procedure that all oil companies use for these emergencies . Why? Because it works. Oil was made to burn. . That's how we use it for energy. There fore that is the logical way to get rid of it also. He also refused to allow sand barriers , chemical cleanup , and skimmers volunteered by the Dutch. Why?  The Jones act. He refused to lift this law to allow assistance from other nations. His loyalty to unions and the E.P.A. also prevented cleanup by our own resourses. This disaster is viewed by the President as just an opportunity to push Cap and Trade again, and to extort money from B.P. , money that should go directly to the people harmed by this disaster , not to the government. The difference between President Bush and Obama is obvious. Bush takes action , Obama talks action.  Bush recinded the Jones Act to allow foreign help with Katrina. Bush also cited the Deepwater Horizon repeatedly for safety violations. Who wins in the Better President contest? President Bush hands down. And , if liberals are looking for the one who comitted sacrilege against their god, Gaia, it's clearly Obama, with his failure to save the environment from further damage by the spill, when he clearly could have. Perhaps it's time for liberals to admit thast Bush was the better President, and leader, and accept the fact that the earth and its resources were put here for us to use by the real God , the only God. You know, the one that President Bush worships.