Cowboy Obama?

Congratulations Obama fans! You voted for change and whast you got was, in many ways, the third term of  George Bush. Although I would probably call Obama Bush Lite. He has continued the war on terror; even increasing the number of troops in Afghanistan. He opposes Gay marriage, supporting the Bush endorsed traditional man woman approach to the institution. He spends tax payers money like a drunken sailor,just like the Bush administration. Yes it's true that he has reached out to middle eastern dictators with his "apologize for America" speeches recently,but the response has been hostile, almost as if they sense the same arrogance and ,dare I say it?, Cowboy attitude in this President as it was in the previous one. Both Obama and Bush have the same attitude toward the terror supporting dictators. Only their approach differs. Obama seeks to control them with words and platitudes, Bush did it with a show of strength and threat of force, which is actually the correct approach, since the Middle Eastern mentality respects strength above all other qualities. They hated Bush, but they respected him. It seems that Obama is regarded as weak and naive. This is certainly not the result Obama was hoping for with his bowing before Saudi princes. Now,with riots occuring in the streets of Iran over their recent sham of an election, Obama has decided to once again play at peace maker, refusing to make a definitive statement in support of the rebels, for fear of ruining his relationship with Ahmadinijad ,which exists only in Obama's own mind. The question is,should the U.S. involve itself in the election conflict of another country? You bet we should. Anytime a nation of people want to rid themselves of a dictatorship and live free , as God intended ,it is our obligation , as it is all free nations to aid them toward this end in any way we can. The U.S. itself would not exist  without help from France ,so the moral  obligation is clear. The fight for freedom is a universal one , and we cannot , in good conscience, turn our backs on other nations that want that freedom and are willing to fight for it. Besides, Pres. O bama has a perfect example of the result of turning our backs on an oppressed nation. During the Clinton administration, Dictator Kim was a growing problem in North Korea, a problem that could have been cut off at the pass at the time with proper sanctions and forceful action against the nation. But, instead , Clinton sent secretary of State  Madeline Albright over to schmooze with Kim, massage his fragile ego with flattery ,and essentially sit around having Tea and cakes with a mad despot, who totally bamboozeled Albright and, in turn, Clinton into giving him everything he wanted; including the means to build a nuclear arsenal that would one day threaten world security. This was done all in the name of trying not to interfere in another country's business. Yeah that works really well , right Neville Chamberlain? Had Mr. Chamberlain taken action against Hitler  when he should have,World War II would never have happened,and millions of lives would have been spared. Remember Pres. Obama, "Those that do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it"., and by your inaction with both Iran and N. Korea; who is now threatening to launch nukes at Hawaii, you risk becoming the new Neville Chamberlain , with the stain of decades of blood on your hands. Stop being Bush Lite.Release the inner Cowboy that lurks inside of you and put a stop to this now while there is time. Stop with the "middle of the road" rhetoric designed to please everyone, because it doesn't work, it just pisses everyone off and makes you look weak and indecisive.  I find it interesting that Obama has taken a strong stance on issues like waterboarding and late term abortion, and he can't wait to close down Gitmo Bay , which houses enemy terrorists. The pres. actually feels that sprinkling water on a terror suspects head is inhumane, but killing a full grown fetus in a woman's stomach is perfectly fine. So when Gitmo does close, what do you do with the  prisoners? No state in our country seems to be willing to take them, and the prisoners may wish they were back in Gitmo if they wind up in one of our Maximum security prisons. They aint getting lemon chicken and rice pilaf for lunch anymore, that's for sure.  The solution is simple; imprison them in our abortion clinics. Sure, why not? Since waterboarding is illegal,and late term abortionis not,why not threaten  them with this procedure? You could show them films of one in progress , remind them of the legality of it, and force watch a few being done in the facility. Explain to them that "late term" applies to them also and is supported by the President himself. I think that they just might decide that Waterboarding was not that bad after all, and certainly beats being  "aborted". Indeed, the Obama  administration could adopt a new slogan to support this method in the fight against terror, "Remember terrorists, it's never too late to be  aborted".